This is a genius solution. It bypasses the dysfunction in Congress. We might need a tutorial in how to get our local and state representatives to introduce legislation to bring it to a vote.
One simple approach now is to ask your state legislators to champion the idea. When I recently spoke to my state delegate about it, she said it's already in the works. Exactly what that means: some legislators are aware of it, or every D is on board, or legislation is already being drafted? And, what kind of public support of pressure would help?
Campaign finance was a mockery before this Confederate Court totally pulled the rug out from under our democracy. But this will be a helpful interim step.
The states should also consider limitations on SuperPacs as they aren't business entities per se but formed as 501C-4 charitable entities with the sole purpose to collect and disguise money from donors. Limiting their powers to give to candidates or causes wouldn't violate the so called free speech of donors as they can always openly donate to candidates or causes.
I'm sorry, but I don't see how "...redefin[ing] the powers Hawaii grants to corporations that operate within the state by taking away from those corporations the ability to spend in Hawaii political campaigns..." is any different from what the Citizens United ruling prohibited, with maintaining freedom of corporate speech the driver of that decision. Can someone please explain the difference?
Yes! Hawaii has given us in the other 49 states, a blueprint and an inspiration. People don’t be a slave to Ai, think, think critically and use your imagination; expand your thinking.
“Great Spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.” (Albert Einstein)
Great summary and analysis - but you left something out: people in Montana came up with the idea - yes, ruby-red MT! And with good reason - they had a law banning corporate money in politics for, oh, going on a century (look it up), that CitzU overturned.
It’s slowly been percolating around the country, mostly in blue states, and congrats to Keohokelole and HI for getting it done first. But remember - you owe it to MT!
YAY!!!! Great News. Hopefully every state will follow Hawaii's success. This should be a no brainer.
This is a genius solution. It bypasses the dysfunction in Congress. We might need a tutorial in how to get our local and state representatives to introduce legislation to bring it to a vote.
One simple approach now is to ask your state legislators to champion the idea. When I recently spoke to my state delegate about it, she said it's already in the works. Exactly what that means: some legislators are aware of it, or every D is on board, or legislation is already being drafted? And, what kind of public support of pressure would help?
Campaign finance was a mockery before this Confederate Court totally pulled the rug out from under our democracy. But this will be a helpful interim step.
Every state should do this but 12 is a good start.
Similar efforts underway elsewhere. Montana was actually first. Vermont among other states working on this.
Someone needs to stop them from letting Trump get his way to take over our country.
Yay Hawaii!
Some real courage backed by action. Great start!
The states should also consider limitations on SuperPacs as they aren't business entities per se but formed as 501C-4 charitable entities with the sole purpose to collect and disguise money from donors. Limiting their powers to give to candidates or causes wouldn't violate the so called free speech of donors as they can always openly donate to candidates or causes.
Please lead the way and set the example for other states! This destructive program must end!
I'm sorry, but I don't see how "...redefin[ing] the powers Hawaii grants to corporations that operate within the state by taking away from those corporations the ability to spend in Hawaii political campaigns..." is any different from what the Citizens United ruling prohibited, with maintaining freedom of corporate speech the driver of that decision. Can someone please explain the difference?
there isnt one. it will also be struck down. but the democrats always have some song and dance instead of real action and results
there isnt one. it will also be struck down. but the democrats always have some song and dance instead of real action and results
there isnt one. it will also be struck down. but the democrats always have some song and dance instead of real action and results
there isnt one. it will also be struck down. but the democrats always have some song and dance instead of real action and results
Amazing! I hope this will be followed by many other states.
Yes! Hawaii has given us in the other 49 states, a blueprint and an inspiration. People don’t be a slave to Ai, think, think critically and use your imagination; expand your thinking.
“Great Spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.” (Albert Einstein)
This pioneering bill to fight corporate and dark money spending passed today in Hawaii. It was supported by all Democrats in both chambers and all but one Republican. More here https://issueone.org/press/hawaiis-pioneering-bipartisan-effort-to-fight-corporate-and-dark-money-spending-in-elections-is-a-model-for-rest-of-country/
EVERY state must do this ‼️
https://montanaplan.org/
Great summary and analysis - but you left something out: people in Montana came up with the idea - yes, ruby-red MT! And with good reason - they had a law banning corporate money in politics for, oh, going on a century (look it up), that CitzU overturned.
It’s slowly been percolating around the country, mostly in blue states, and congrats to Keohokelole and HI for getting it done first. But remember - you owe it to MT!